Ethics question
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:18 pm
Hello everyone,
It is nice to write to you all. I went into chat and did this, but I think I will do it here too in an effort to (a) gather input and (b) stimulate discussion.
I am in college now. I am going to a christian university in an accelerated learning program for a business degree.
I am to write a paper on my opinion on the ethics of the story below. I have decided which route I will be going, but its always good to critically thing something through on all sides of a situation.
Behold:
Earlier this year, a successful and popular administrator at the Massachusetts Instute of Technology lost her job after 28 years when it was discovered that she had falsified her academic credentials on her resume 30 years before. Although she had earned an undergraduate degree from one college, she listed a different institution on her resume, and she included two other academic degrees that she had never earned. However, she was nationally recognized for her work and had risen to a senior position based on her extensive experience and ability. In response to her forced resignation, some have claimed that any falsification of academic credentials, no matter how old or inconsequential, should be punished as unethical and fraudulent. Others, though, have suggested that if someone has proven his or her abilities through years of experience, success, and recognition, then the discovery of a misrepresentation of academic credentials from years ago is actually a minor matter.
ISSUE: What is the appropriate response to this or other similar situations? How should employes and the public respond to a discovery of misrepresentation or falsification of academic credentials after years of successful achievement?
It is nice to write to you all. I went into chat and did this, but I think I will do it here too in an effort to (a) gather input and (b) stimulate discussion.
I am in college now. I am going to a christian university in an accelerated learning program for a business degree.
I am to write a paper on my opinion on the ethics of the story below. I have decided which route I will be going, but its always good to critically thing something through on all sides of a situation.
Behold:
Earlier this year, a successful and popular administrator at the Massachusetts Instute of Technology lost her job after 28 years when it was discovered that she had falsified her academic credentials on her resume 30 years before. Although she had earned an undergraduate degree from one college, she listed a different institution on her resume, and she included two other academic degrees that she had never earned. However, she was nationally recognized for her work and had risen to a senior position based on her extensive experience and ability. In response to her forced resignation, some have claimed that any falsification of academic credentials, no matter how old or inconsequential, should be punished as unethical and fraudulent. Others, though, have suggested that if someone has proven his or her abilities through years of experience, success, and recognition, then the discovery of a misrepresentation of academic credentials from years ago is actually a minor matter.
ISSUE: What is the appropriate response to this or other similar situations? How should employes and the public respond to a discovery of misrepresentation or falsification of academic credentials after years of successful achievement?